![]() |
||||||||||||
| My Account | Programs | Courses | ||||||||||
| Home | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
eDebate:
This event was recorded on: Course ID: AA0212
[View Recording] (26 Megabytes) Supported by an educational grant from: |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Protagonist |
|||||||||||
|
|
Antagonist Christopher White, MD, FSCAI Cardiology Chairman, Ochsner Clinical Foundation, New Orleans, LA Disclosures: No relationship with a commercial party to disclose. |
|||||||||||
![]() |
Moderator: |
|||||||||||
|
Overview Clinical studies looking at renal stenting point to high survival rates for patients with renal artery stenosis and at least some success in lowering risk factors such as hypertension. ASPIRE 2, a multicenter prospective nonrandomized trial involving 208 patients, reported restenosis rates equal to or better than those previously reported in the clinical literature. Stent placement was successful in 99.6% of patients, with a restenosis rate of 17.4% at 9-month follow-up with duplex ultrasound. The ASPIRE 2 trial validated a number of smaller single institution studies; however, the procedure does have limits. In another study, investigators at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center found that patients with creatinine levels lower than 3 mg/dL are the ones most likely to have a successful renal function salvage, while hypertensive patients experience varying degrees of improvement. Investigators at that institution believe that while a link between intervention and a lower risk of cardiovascular events is possible, this should be validated by case-controlled or prospective randomized trials. In this point/counterpoint debate, Dr. Cooper
(pro) and Dr. White (con) will discuss clinical studies to date on renal
stenting and will argue whether more studies are needed to determine which
patients would most benefit from this procedure. Upon completion of this course, you should
be able to:
Learner Participation to Earn Credit To earn a CME certificate, you must:
Computer Requirements to Participate Click here to view the computer requirements to participate in this activity. Target Audience This program will be of special interest to invasive and interventional cardiologists, fellows-in-training, cath lab nurses, technologists, technicians, and staff. Accreditation Period This activity was approved for AMA category 1 credit for
two years from the original release date of September 3, 2003. After September
3, 2005 it will no longer be certified for credit, but may still have
value for the healthcare provider. Accreditation Statement Continuing Medical Education for Physicians The Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions designates this educational activity for a maximum of one category 1 credit toward the AMA Physician's Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only the credit that he/she actually spent in the activity. Questions Regarding This Event Please click here to e-mail any questions you have regarding this activity. As an organization accredited for continuing medical education (CME), SCAI fully complies with the legal requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act rules and regulations. If any participant is in need of accommodations, written requests should be submitted as soon as possible. |
||||||||||||
|
Course Certificate Fees These events are produced in partnership with SCAI and MEBN.NET and are FREE for SCAI members thanks to a generous grant from Pfizer. |
||||||||||||
|
(C) 2003, Medical
Education Broadcast Network. All Rights Reserved.
|
||||||||||||